Saturday, 14 June 2014

Of gods and totally ordered sets

some people choose to believe in god and some don't. i have met several people who can even decide the degree to which they believe in god. 'thoda sa' as they would say. does god's belief come in installments.i dunno.to my experience, i have encountered people who are orthodoxian in the existence of their gods like my parents and i have met scientists who are partial believers of their god. i have also met people who know (or they think so) that god doesn't exist but choose to believe he does. i chose 'he' because it would be difficult to think of female god. how could a female, a mother, a daughter, a girlfriend create such a stupid world. only men are good at this. or maybe god is a transvestite or maybe he doesn't have a sex or maybe he's not a person or maybe he is the sky above us who sees everything and makes people comfortable by its benevolent presence or maybe he is driver of the bus i sit in everyday to go to lecture hall or maybe he is the rice i ate today or maybe the keyboard on which i am typing or maybe i am one. how would one ever know.

the portrayal of god in religion have been depicted to the point of utter amusement and is comical at its root, if god does exist, which i am really skeptic of, then why should he have 4 arms and look like a malformed -genetically modified human.i am talking of Hindu gods. well there are lot of them. if god is taken to the most superior being among all souls, how can there be more than one. if there are two god, who live in a totally ordered set,then their powers are comparable(this is the order) and one of them must be superior. assuming set of all gods is totally ordered under the their respective powers, then there must exist a bigger god to every god, and then if one is required to believe in gods then why not choose the most powerful one. this Hindu philosophy has trouble comprehending,so they said 'well gods powers can be compared, so if they form a set,your logic would work, they said that the collection of all gods is not a set,its a class'. and i was hysterical. other religion have tried to avoid this issue,by not directly working with god,but with messengers of them. Jesus turns out to be son of god but not god himself,so why is he given so much respect and stature. because he was sent by god or at least he said so. now would you believe that. 'hey James,wassup?my name is Jesus,well my father "god" sent me to ask to follow him,pray his name before you eat and lot of other stuff which he has typeset in a book you will get, will you do that.
now James was confused.he said,
'life is normal, i hunt, i get food, i eat.no big deal'
'if i spent time on this stuff, i will not be able to focus on my family's well-being,so thanks but no thanks'.
several other religions have adopted this concept of not allowing  human beings to directly see god but their messenger ,this goes with Islam and maybe some more.
some who were blessed by god's messengers become demi-god themselves and the power flows through them and its ok for people to respect and believe these demi-gods whom they can  see and talk with,in order, to be in communium with god himself. these demi-gods are priests.
so you might ask, what is all the fuss about.
believe in god if you want to,otherwise not. it works for most of us.
until god is attached with religion which was a concept invented by someone to help people put blame and hopes on someone else and not their own incompetency or maybe  just plain bad luck. god was for everything. the random component of the environment which decided which days which it will start raining, which days it would be a washout, how long a person will live, how far the road will go. all the worldly decisions which could ever be made were already taken, and we are just merely enacting them out.
until also the religion with the set of rules it comes with, decides to act physically. don’t let earth get crowded with people who don’t believe in this. there's no point in them living. either they should start believing which might or might not be enough, otherwise they gotta die. now this fact that taking someone's life is decided just by a set of rules someone came up with long time ago makes it really difficult to decide the worth of life. only those who are powerful survive. so whatever they do, the world must do. this way the world was given Christianity from a small flock of people who inhabited tons of islands just for fun. that's how Christianity came to Africa, India, south east Asia, America,and Caribbean. they said their god was better than the older gods of people or maybe if they had none,they put the fear in people first and gave them the antidote as god. to support the notion that their god was powerful ,they came with heavy artillery and big horses. now who would disagree to the fact that men of British god are so powerful, then god must be harbinger of all pains and desire which could wipe out everyone,if angered. this is how most religions spread. one particular instance is beautifully denoted in the novel of chinua Achebe 'things fall apart'.
initially in the hunter gatherer times when men were living comfortably i presume, they had nothing to do,they would get bored easily, they invented something which would keep all of them including their descendents busy for lifetimes and that would not be enough. they came up with the idea to give an 'axiom schema' , a way to invent thing,lot of things. the algorithm was,'choose a particular set of rules,anything random would work, which everyone should follow and the rules should not be such that everyone can follow them and not so hard that no one can follow them,this would give rise to disparity among people,their degree of proficiency in abiding by the rules would give them position in society.
a game in which the rules included believing in a superior being who controlled everyone, not eating deer on Sundays, eating humans on Tuesdays, not having sex on Thursday between morning to evening',etc..' is called a religion of some type.
deeding on different rules, we get different religion.
given some rules,we also get mathematics.
given somewhat lesser rules,we get physics.
this is how the 'siesta' was invented.
i do wonder if everything in world is just a game. we humans start enacting it the moment we are born and play it till you are forced to withdraw, then people stop talking to you and you are experienced enough to dismiss them and not take care of them.
atheism turns out to be the spreading in one form or the other. now the rules of the game are changing.it is also somewhat trendy to be an atheist. people look up to you,they look at you and wonder 'what will happen to him when he is judged by god',their god, because in their eyes,their god was the supreme power. and seeing your carelessness,they presume that god himself,their god,must have made you that way. that means ,you are not out of the clutches of the god, you still are judged by him.

Friday, 6 June 2014

Summer of '14

I guess this is apt time to write 'Summer of '14 ' .
I dont know what i am doing.
I dont know why i am doing what i am doing.
i dont know if it could be better.
So i ask myself. DUde what;s up.
And then the story starts.
I am currently attending an instructional school on Basic quadratic forms in IISER,mohali. one of the organisers of the school is Shripad garge,well this time he seems little more friendly than what he was before. Schedule,you dont ask. morning 8 am breakfast, and the same one each day,aloo parantha, gotta start hating it sometimes, lecture starts at 9.30 am and goes on till 1 pm with some breaks in between. then lunch in lhc and then tutorial from 2 to 4 pm. well,if there is no guest lecture. and then we come back and do nothing in particular. and then dinner at 8 pm and a night session,sometimes from 9.30 to 11 pm and then we go to sleep,that is ,if it comes. and the cycle starts all over again. i have only been 4 days or so into the school and i dont feel intimidated yet, so i am pretty happy with it. i am the youngest participant here. and i understand stuff,so it feels nice. i even solve some problems on board, that also feels nice. i hate the  old man in the canteen who is actually paid to give us stuff but he does it so miserably ,it feels like we have asked his life in installments to be delivered to us. that old miserable bloke. and then i am supposed to be going to bangalore next month for some random shit in physics and biology. its just because i want free food and some time to stay away from pune, which is a depressing place these days. manish here cracks very nice jokes, well,he is a faculty. he made such nice imitation of khanduja about her 'thing' with 'hensel's lemma' , her students state a new version of it and they find it equivalent to the orgiinal one each time. sweet. then last month i did some 'commutative algebra' and little bit of category theory and i think i am gonna delve deeper into the category theory. i at least by the end of next semester should be able to state and prove the adjoint functor theorem. and then use it to show the existence of tensor functor. food here is actually not that bad considering it is free.
i watched xmen, didn't feel very awesome bout it,its a very very normal movie. no action, jackman looks very old, how could they show him in a college dress and stuff. too old for that. i also read a couple of novels in pune. like 'the god of small things' which was a pretty good one, really nice, it is so simple and it speaks of very very normal things in life and the story is just so charming because of its simplicity,the way children behave. i also read 'the story of my assasins' by tarun tejpal. now that i see it, it was charming initially ,maybe because of erotic component in his novels, but otherwise it seemed well written, very well written.  i started 'the new life' by orhan pamuk by its starting was so shitty, i stopped in the middle and threw it , is bout a boy who reads some book by the same name and his life has changed in a day and he cant stop reading it and the author will never mention what is in the book llike for half of the book, so at some point i gave up, i dont want to know,period. though i read 'nother one of his novel 'snow' which was lost by me before i could complete it,although whatever part i read , i liked very much. it somehow reminded me of 'devil and miss primm' . i started 'perfume;the story of a murderer' but through the initial few pages it was interesting and then i could make much sense of french places so i left it in middle. maybe i will resume it some day. i might read 'deception point' but considering my  mentality about dan brown ,i can already predict the story knowing nothing bout  it. it will involve some high profile organisation in which something will go wrong and someone will come to correct it,maybe langdon himself, and then the most normal guy with a high post or something will turn out to be the villain.  lets hope its not this. i saw '12 angry men' it seems very similar to a movie made on some 'agatha christie novel in which the good guy convinces the jury of innocence of someone who was not really innocent.i saw a hindi movie after a very long time and i did not regret this one, this is called 'no smoking' a movie in which a chain smoker's life changes every instance he goes to an organisation to get rid of his cigs habit. its a nice movie except that nobody really knows what was real and what was his dream.
too much for now. lets see where life takes us. so long.